Bruce makes concerning claim about 3-5-2 formation – & responds to ‘laughable’ criticism

Steve Bruce claims “it’s too early to change formations” ahead of Sunday’s trip to Spurs, saying his 3-5-2 system worked “very, very well against Arsenal” and that his players need time to get used to it.

It may still be very early days, but his reluctance to change formation does concern me.

I might be wrong, but it looks fundamentally flawed in so many areas, with us looking lost in just about every area of the field ever since the second half of that 1-0 defeat against Arsenal on the opening day.

Here’s what he had to say about the formation, ‘tinkering’ at Tottenham and the on-field relationship between Almiron and Joelinton (or lack of it) ahead of Sunday’s game:

“We may tinker a bit and change a couple of things. It’s too early to change formations.

It’s new for Joe – it’s new for four or five players. Given time, we hope they can forge some sort of relationship. For Almirón, we’re working on getting him higher up the pitch and into a goalscoring position.

Perhaps he wants to put his own stamp on this Newcastle side and go with his own formation, but I can’t help but feel it’s time to swallow his pride and revert to the 3-4-3 that worked so well under Rafa Benitez before any more damage is done.

I hope I’m proved wrong on this one, but a 3-4-3 which incorporates Almiron and Saint-Maximin in their natural positions, declutters the midfield and gets support up to Joelinton appears to make MUCH more sense.

The Newcastle United head coach also claims that some of the criticism towards him has been ‘laughable’ over the past week, slating Michael Chopra for spreading ‘lies’ about the team allegedly ‘not knowing their jobs’ in his side.

After two games there is a so-called mini crisis. Everything is over sensationalised. There’s always a storm in Newcastle. At the minute we’re in one. The only way I can shut a few people up is by getting results. The buck stops with me.

The Michael Chopra thing was blown out of all proportion. It’s laughable, really.

“Im just surprised that people take any attention of him. Some of the stuff is just fabricated and lies. When it’s like that, you think why is that making national headlines – which is total rubbish.

Some of it is laughable, we can’t even have a warm-up. But I need to stay dignified.

It’s not for me to comment on what’s been said but there’s often a storm in Newcastle. It’s two games & I just want it to be fair & responsible. I know the only way I can shut people up is by winning games & I know the quicker the better.

I think it’s totally right for Bruce to rubbish those claims and defend himself on that one – how would Chopra be getting inside info from senior players?

Some of the criticism has been totally justified, with the team and general tactics being all at sea ever since that second half against Arsenal, however I can’t help but feel Chopra’s claims were a desperate attempt for him to jump on the ant-Bruce bandwagon with a set of lies that would make him look relevant and in the know.

Instead, they’ve made him look pretty bitter and silly, with him making damaging claims about a subject he’s very unlikely to have any inside information on.

(Fancy writing for us? Get in touch at NUFCblogsubmissions@gmail.com & we’ll get back to you!)

About Olly Hawkins

Olly has been a Junior Magpie from birth. As a season ticket holder and avid Newcastle United fan - he eats, sleeps and breathes all things NUFC.

4 thoughts on “Bruce makes concerning claim about 3-5-2 formation – & responds to ‘laughable’ criticism

  1. Steve Bruce is a donkey everything about the man is flawed, he was under one of the greatest managers this country has seen, did he not learn anything, pathetic full of excuses

      (Quote)

  2. Spot on with the 3-4-3 analysis. It allows us to drop into a 5-4-1 without the ball and then spring into a counter with the 3 up front. Giving us width to attack the channels. Something the current formation doesn’t, we’ve been far to narrow in attack. Hayden has been taking up the RM role when attacking, which is mental. The CM’s aren’t good enough to play a fluid system. They’re best in rigid positions to provide cover for the forwards. Everyone is saying this, other than Bruce and his assistants.

      (Quote)

  3. When the F did Rafa ever play 3-4-3??? In reality it always worked out as a 5-4-1 or when he felt adventurous, 5-3-1-1.
    Playing Joelinton up front in a Rondon / lone striker role is not going to work either as that’s not where he normally plays – and even then he’s not exactly prolific anyway!

      (Quote)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green