A ‘third option’ for the future of St James Park has cropped up with a final decision on Newcastle United’s stadium to be announced soon.
The main conversation around what happens next has been centred around two options. Move away from the Cathedral on the Hill on a new custom-built site, or redevelop the current iconic stadium.
Steeped in history in the centre of our city, talks of relocation have failed to please some fans – though the club has promised it will be close to the existing site. The latest option being discussed however takes the debate in a different direction.
Third option discussed
Newcastle are considering knocking down the stadium and rebuilding a new and improved St James’ Park on the same site, according to Mark Douglas of the i.
It seems the two main options remain the focus, with a total rebuild creating even more questions about the logistics involved, such as where would we play in the meantime? The club, however, are ‘weeks away from revealing their final decision, bringing an end to years of debate.
One thing that is certain is that any work will need to be completed six months prior to our first game as a host city of Euro 2028, so a little under three years from now.
But, PIF have already completed extensive due diligence on the project about what work would be possible on a site restricted by the listed buildings surrounding it.
PSR vs St James’ Park history
It’s a tough call, especially in the short-term it won’t feel like home. Until new memories are made with loved ones, until we fall in love with the place all over again, a complete rebuild or relocation will feel unbelievably alien.
Conversely if we want to get to the top and regularly compete with Europe’s elite, Profit and Sustainability Rules are forcing us more than ever before to raise as much money where we can in order to rise up. Sentimentality and history battle with the desire to compete in the tale as old as time: ‘head vs heart’.
A total rebuild on the same site may provide the happy medium to keep the St James feel but with a modernised experience, our owners will want to impress during Euro 2028 after all. It would keep the city thriving especially in the near perimeter, but provide an increased capacity and ‘upgraded’ stadium.
As I’ve mentioned before, any suggestion a major rebuild could be completed six months before Euro 2028 is totally laughable and utter fantasy. The evidence is overwhelming. Plenty stadia have been rebuilt and not one of them has been achieved anywhere near this time scale. Nowhere near.
davewallace(Quote)
This does also seem to gloss over the fact that if they do build on leazes park sjp is not just going to be left standing like some footballing national trust property
Nick(Quote)
yeah knock S JP Down and a new build stadium we have not won out there for 75 years so of holds no great memories of winning anything of great importance sick to death hearing about it took 2 years to find out we could not build on leazes terrace when every already knew that
rintintin(Quote)
Agreed. We’ve won next to nothing there. Do we keep on plodding along, finishing behind the richer clubs or do we go for it, build new and join them?
Dave(Quote)
Build a new stadium on leazes park, knock down the old stadium and return this to parkland therefore nothing lost for the greenies
David Rutherford(Quote)
Whatever the time scale, building a new stadium on the same site would give memories AND a new start. That kind of wins with head and heart. As long as they dont ask us to play home games at the stadium of *****!!
Robbie!(Quote)
How about the town moor? Same Freeman’s herbage rights, plenty of space, flat, good transport links etc.
Mike(Quote)
St James for most folk is a heartbreak hotel… nonsense to say it would be heart wrenching to leave .., we need a brand new super stadia , 75k minimum which will develop the city , create jobs and deliver a large increase in income to allow us to compete against the cartel
Mike(Quote)